Politicians are paid to carry out the Public’s wishes but “voting” apps can register what taxpayers want done, then pass on their decisions to the officials responsible for completing the job.
I.E. eliminate costly politicians that get these officials to do what they want and not so much what taxpayers are asking for.
If the public wants to increase UI benefits instead of the salaries of these politicians, then these “voting” apps could pass on their decisions to these officials, and taxpayers would not have to pay these politicians while they fought to get their own way in the matter.
Since increasing these benefits instead of these salaries would help close the earnings gap between the rich and poor, tax rebates may be given to those that vote based on the figures presented in these apps.
Greater rebates may be given when more than 50% of these taxpayers vote in any matters, as incentive to take part in the democratic process.
Polls accompanying this article mean to determine what Federal reforms may stop politicians from benefitting more than other taxpayers.